The world is full of Chicken Lickens, and I am not talking about KFC. I am an agorophobic and I often wonder why there are'nt more folk like me. I am aware though that this disorder is growing. And with all the fear mongering in the world I can understand it.
Chicken Licken for those that don't know ran about yelling the sky is falling, bit like the boy crying wolf.
Now please I am not a complete idiot, we live in a vast universe on a planet called earth. Like the universe, like the earth, like humanity it is all evolving. It has taken billions of years and many changes, climatic and volcanic.
During those years the earth has wobbled on its axis it rotates closer and further away from other stars in the galaxy and planets in the solar system, it is a natural progression of the planet. These chicken lichens in the world including the anti smoking doomsayers drive their opinions with fear and guilt.
Who is aware of the one most important elements in the atmosphere???? It is carbon we live and breathe it. These nay and doomsayers believe humanity drives the planet. Well bullpucky I say. We humans are but a grain of sand on the beach , a gnat on the bum of a camel.
These doomsayers could do as much damage as us so called polluters. How much of this carbon should be removed from our atmosphere? Nature and the universe the wobbling on earths axis are climate change are a natural phenonom. Speak to geologists, they see the different climate changes in rock, by drilling ice cores from perma frost. Any changes found and the further back these samples go, climate change is evident, with or without humanity.
Should we now imagine that dinosaurs pooped themselves into extinction, ate their way through the earth vegetaion enuf methane and defolage to cause climate change.
Well agorophobic or not I am sure we will go through climate change it is nature and the universe at work, nothing these kneetremblers say or do will stop that.
Get a grip folk, shit happens and the planet will be here and changing for a few more million year we waste huge amount of money on these kneetremblers, anti,smokers, greenies and doomsayers.
Lets get back to being the humanity we once were and filter this money into our pioneering spirit so we can explore the universe and find other planets to populate.
Oh silly me the kneetremblers would say it is impossible and terribly unsafe. Grrrrrrr
Thursday, July 30, 2009
Saturday, July 25, 2009
Here's a Load of Bollocks For ya
My son has an honours degree in Medisinal Chemistry and his response to the following article was...."What a load of bollocks."
WEll I agree son , most of these studies are a load of bollocks. If you believe the following article you have no brains cells.
................................................................................................................................................................
Damage from passive smoking can be found in the blood vessels of children just 10 years old.
Parents who smoke in the home can cause their child's arteries to show signs of clogging and hardening, dramatically raising their overall life-time risk of heart attack.
A German study which took in almost 400 10-year-olds found those with smoking parents could also have emerging signs of atherosclerosis.
Earlier research has shown a link between second-hand smoke and the condition in adults.
"To show that in healthy 10-year-old kids they've got these increased markers of what we normally associate with a really bad risk of heart attack is alarming," Australian atherosclerosis expert Professor David Celermajer said in reaction to the study.
"This is from being exposed to passive smoke from their parents all their lives.
"These children are not about to drop dead when they're 11 or 12 but it indicates they're a three or four-fold higher risk of heart attack in their 40s or 50s."
Prof Celermajer, of Sydney University and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, says an Australian study conducted in 1996 also found evidence of blood vessel damage in 15-year-olds who were exposed to passive smoke in the home.
He says while research suggested these ill effects could be reversed within two years if the child lived in a smoke-free house, for many the ramifications of parental smoking were life-long.
"I see a lot of people with heart attacks in their 40s and 50s, who have no risk factors at all except having exposure to passive smoke in childhood," Prof Celermajer says.
"So it starts a process that becomes accelerated in that person ... (smoking) casts a long shadow."
A coalition of health and child welfare organisations says the study showed why government needed to speed up smoke-free reforms.
"This is more evidence pointing to the need for all public areas frequented by children including dining areas, playgrounds, public pools, beaches and sports fields, to be made smoke-free by law," says Protecting Children from Tobacco spokesman Stafford Sanders.
"... and for any governments that have not yet made cars carrying children smoke-free to do so quickly."
The study "Environmental tobacco smoke and cardiometabolic risk in young children" is published in the European Heart Journal.
WEll I agree son , most of these studies are a load of bollocks. If you believe the following article you have no brains cells.
................................................................................................................................................................
Damage from passive smoking can be found in the blood vessels of children just 10 years old.
Parents who smoke in the home can cause their child's arteries to show signs of clogging and hardening, dramatically raising their overall life-time risk of heart attack.
A German study which took in almost 400 10-year-olds found those with smoking parents could also have emerging signs of atherosclerosis.
Earlier research has shown a link between second-hand smoke and the condition in adults.
"To show that in healthy 10-year-old kids they've got these increased markers of what we normally associate with a really bad risk of heart attack is alarming," Australian atherosclerosis expert Professor David Celermajer said in reaction to the study.
"This is from being exposed to passive smoke from their parents all their lives.
"These children are not about to drop dead when they're 11 or 12 but it indicates they're a three or four-fold higher risk of heart attack in their 40s or 50s."
Prof Celermajer, of Sydney University and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, says an Australian study conducted in 1996 also found evidence of blood vessel damage in 15-year-olds who were exposed to passive smoke in the home.
He says while research suggested these ill effects could be reversed within two years if the child lived in a smoke-free house, for many the ramifications of parental smoking were life-long.
"I see a lot of people with heart attacks in their 40s and 50s, who have no risk factors at all except having exposure to passive smoke in childhood," Prof Celermajer says.
"So it starts a process that becomes accelerated in that person ... (smoking) casts a long shadow."
A coalition of health and child welfare organisations says the study showed why government needed to speed up smoke-free reforms.
"This is more evidence pointing to the need for all public areas frequented by children including dining areas, playgrounds, public pools, beaches and sports fields, to be made smoke-free by law," says Protecting Children from Tobacco spokesman Stafford Sanders.
"... and for any governments that have not yet made cars carrying children smoke-free to do so quickly."
The study "Environmental tobacco smoke and cardiometabolic risk in young children" is published in the European Heart Journal.
Friday, July 24, 2009
Abuse a Smoker A Day
"Smokers are now the only minority whose minority status is quoted as justification for abuse."-
Joe Jackson
Joe Jackson
Wednesday, July 22, 2009
We Are NOT unpersons. We are NOT Vermin.
As most of the folks on these lists know, I've not only done no Obama bashing, but I've jumped on people who have. In these groups we are not Democrat or Republican or even Libertarian.
We are a big mix of people all of whom (except for the lurking Antis) have one thing in common: we feel smokers are being treated unfairly and unjustly and we feel that this has been done on the basis of lies created and promulgated by activist Antismokers and by those who live off the hundreds of millions of dollars in antismoking grant money from the MSA funding and from the NicoGummyPatchyPeople pushing their nicotine therapy products. Aside from our disagreement with Obama's SCHIP tax, the rest of his politics is something we should keep out of these groups if we want people to continue working together, and in particular we should make clear that we do not in any way support the not-so-thinly-veiled racism that we see so much of on the internet in the attacks on his policies.
But today Obama went over the edge. He not only broke a campaign promise, but he lied, lied absolutely without question, on national TV. And the lie he told, if we lie back and accept it without screaming long and loud, relegates us officially to the status of unpersons, of vermin not worth even a thought because we officially simply do not exist as citizens of America.
Below are two postings. I made the first one on several boards early this morning. I am now putting up variations of the second one. If you see a board somewhere discussing his Today show appearance and/or his health care plan, feel free to borrow from or outright paste from the below to get our message out.
We are NOT unpersons. We are NOT vermin. We are Americans and we will NOT tolerate being erased.
- Michael J. McFadden
===
This morning's post:
Depending on Bloggers???
If President Obama is depending on bloggers for support I think he may have a problem. We're not nearly as forgiving as Meredith Vieira on the Today show. Think about this:
which is worse? #1 below or #2 below?
1) President Obama said, "The only tax change I've made in the 6 months I've been here is to cut people's taxes."
He said that - despite the clear and recorded fact that he raised cigarette pack taxes by 150% and raised the tax on one of the poorest well-defined minority groups in the country, smokers so poor they roll their own from shreds of tobacco and scraps of paper by OVER TWO THOUSAND PERCENT (from $1/lb to $24/lb). Note: this minority group averages well under $25,000 a year in income... not over $250,000 per year.
or
2) That Meredith Vieira simply let him get away with such a blatantly false statement without even a hint of a challenge?
Bloggers won't let him get off so easily.
Michael J. McFadden
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
===
This afternoon's post:
I have to admit, I am truly, completely, totally mystified.
Breaking campaign promises is one thing. Even when they are broken blatantly and without apologies.
Lying is something else entirely.
President Obama clearly, without ANY doubt or quibbling whatsoever, blatantly lied to the cameras this morning on the Today show and NO ONE seems to be raising the issue.
Obama said, and I quote exactly as you can see in the original clip:
"The only tax change I've made in the 6 months I've been here is to cut people's taxes."
He said that - despite the clear and recorded fact that he raised cigarette pack taxes by 150% and raised the tax on one of the poorest well-defined minority groups in the country, smokers so poor they roll their own from shreds of tobacco and scraps of paper by OVER TWO THOUSAND PERCENT (from $1/lb to $24/lb). Note: this minority group averages well under $25,000 a year in income... not over $250,000 per year.
He said that, and Meredith didn't even wince, much less even TRY to pretend to be a journalist and ask him about it.
And in all the previous postings on this board today, no one else seems to give it any importance either.
He **LIED** - no waffling, no minor prevarication, no slight mis-slip-of-the-tongue, he LIED just as blatantly as if Bush had said "We've set up no holding facilities for terrorists offshore." and no one seems to be calling him on it.
Can anyone offer an explanation for this???
Michael J. McFaddenAuthor of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
====
Michael J. McFaddenAuthor of Dissecting Antismokers' BrainsMid-Atlantic Director, Citizens Freedom Alliance, Inc.Director, Pennsylvania Smokers' Action Network (PASAN)
http://www.antibrains.com
We are a big mix of people all of whom (except for the lurking Antis) have one thing in common: we feel smokers are being treated unfairly and unjustly and we feel that this has been done on the basis of lies created and promulgated by activist Antismokers and by those who live off the hundreds of millions of dollars in antismoking grant money from the MSA funding and from the NicoGummyPatchyPeople pushing their nicotine therapy products. Aside from our disagreement with Obama's SCHIP tax, the rest of his politics is something we should keep out of these groups if we want people to continue working together, and in particular we should make clear that we do not in any way support the not-so-thinly-veiled racism that we see so much of on the internet in the attacks on his policies.
But today Obama went over the edge. He not only broke a campaign promise, but he lied, lied absolutely without question, on national TV. And the lie he told, if we lie back and accept it without screaming long and loud, relegates us officially to the status of unpersons, of vermin not worth even a thought because we officially simply do not exist as citizens of America.
Below are two postings. I made the first one on several boards early this morning. I am now putting up variations of the second one. If you see a board somewhere discussing his Today show appearance and/or his health care plan, feel free to borrow from or outright paste from the below to get our message out.
We are NOT unpersons. We are NOT vermin. We are Americans and we will NOT tolerate being erased.
- Michael J. McFadden
===
This morning's post:
Depending on Bloggers???
If President Obama is depending on bloggers for support I think he may have a problem. We're not nearly as forgiving as Meredith Vieira on the Today show. Think about this:
which is worse? #1 below or #2 below?
1) President Obama said, "The only tax change I've made in the 6 months I've been here is to cut people's taxes."
He said that - despite the clear and recorded fact that he raised cigarette pack taxes by 150% and raised the tax on one of the poorest well-defined minority groups in the country, smokers so poor they roll their own from shreds of tobacco and scraps of paper by OVER TWO THOUSAND PERCENT (from $1/lb to $24/lb). Note: this minority group averages well under $25,000 a year in income... not over $250,000 per year.
or
2) That Meredith Vieira simply let him get away with such a blatantly false statement without even a hint of a challenge?
Bloggers won't let him get off so easily.
Michael J. McFadden
Author of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
===
This afternoon's post:
I have to admit, I am truly, completely, totally mystified.
Breaking campaign promises is one thing. Even when they are broken blatantly and without apologies.
Lying is something else entirely.
President Obama clearly, without ANY doubt or quibbling whatsoever, blatantly lied to the cameras this morning on the Today show and NO ONE seems to be raising the issue.
Obama said, and I quote exactly as you can see in the original clip:
"The only tax change I've made in the 6 months I've been here is to cut people's taxes."
He said that - despite the clear and recorded fact that he raised cigarette pack taxes by 150% and raised the tax on one of the poorest well-defined minority groups in the country, smokers so poor they roll their own from shreds of tobacco and scraps of paper by OVER TWO THOUSAND PERCENT (from $1/lb to $24/lb). Note: this minority group averages well under $25,000 a year in income... not over $250,000 per year.
He said that, and Meredith didn't even wince, much less even TRY to pretend to be a journalist and ask him about it.
And in all the previous postings on this board today, no one else seems to give it any importance either.
He **LIED** - no waffling, no minor prevarication, no slight mis-slip-of-the-tongue, he LIED just as blatantly as if Bush had said "We've set up no holding facilities for terrorists offshore." and no one seems to be calling him on it.
Can anyone offer an explanation for this???
Michael J. McFaddenAuthor of "Dissecting Antismokers' Brains"
====
Michael J. McFaddenAuthor of Dissecting Antismokers' BrainsMid-Atlantic Director, Citizens Freedom Alliance, Inc.Director, Pennsylvania Smokers' Action Network (PASAN)
http://www.antibrains.com
Monday, July 20, 2009
The Drunken Crocodile
Gian TurciArticle Published: 2009/05/25
Everyone who knows me also knows that I abhor alcohol. I never touched it in my life and probably never will – unless it’s to celebrate the defeat of the Therapeutic State.
The smell of alcohol turns my stomach (literally), and drunken people drive me nuts. Sometimes I even feel a surge of anger when I see a person’s speech and brain become progressively sluggish, embalmed in the stupor of self-induced idiocy.
Those are my emotions – but that is not a moral judgement, it is not a condemnation – and, especially, it is not a call for prohibition, control, regulation, and brainwashing of children and adults. That is because, fortunately, I have principles, thus I am not an “anti.” Indeed, I fight the “antis” with all I have.I submit here that society is getting progressively drunker on contemporary environmentalism and healthism.
The new fanaticism vomits panic, prohibition, regulation, control, surveillance, bureaucracy, state agencies, an idiotic perception of safety, and so on. It stinks with cheap moralism and arrogant contempt for dissent. Junk science and false information aimed at inducing “safe,” “healthy,” and “politically correct” behaviour belch at us noisomely.This drunken system sees dangers and risks everywhere. The real problem, the toxic system itself, cannot recognize the very real danger it represents, boggled as it is with multiplied visions of its paranoid fears. Stupefied bureaucracy and politics are so much under the influence of healthism that they can’t even count to ten, thus the only number they understand is zero. Zero risk. Zero tolerance. Zero smoking.
Zero emissions. Zero drinking. Zero accidents. Zero obesity.For that awful drunkenness I have infinite contempt. I call urgently for its suppression, and yes, that is a moral judgement. In this particular regard, surely and confidently, I advocate every strategy of war. Evil deserves to be strangled. It must be stopped. There is only one circumstance under which I am an anti, which is, when it comes to suppressing and annihilating the anti mentality. For it I have zero tolerance. Why? Because, for those intoxicated people, everything that makes life worthwhile can be happily sacrificed to suffocate and control their targets.
Liberty, economy, free markets, integrity, personal responsibility, politics, logic, truth, justice, employment and fairness are to them like the mindlessly motivated planetary gears in a differential: they have to change constantly to accommodate the drive. In other words, all those social conquests – some earned with blood – can all be redefined to accommodate the healthist crusades. The costs become irrelevant next to the projected and theoretical benefits of their ideology, implemented with “pretzel-logic” economics.Look at this website, for example [stored link]. It represents a gang of non-governmental organizations that are preparing for the suppression of alcohol through regulation.
Everyone reading here should be familiar with the pattern: it is that of the war against tobacco. The alcohol industry is depicted as the bad, sleazy guys eager to make money by killing people. The customers of the industry are its victims. The infectious agent sent out by the corrupting industry is advertisement. It follows that alcohol advertisement on the Internet (and everywhere else) must be suppressed – just as happened with tobacco.
The youth card is, of course, abundantly played. Please name a bigot (or a tyrant) who has not screamed “the children!” …Thank you, I knew you couldn’t think of one.
Finally, the junk science epidemiological stunner cannot be missing: did you know that drinking “causes” HIV?...Remarkably, the will of the “victim” is never, ever in the equation: the consumer has no resolve to refuse/ignore advertisement or to control his own behaviour. His judgement is impaired by his “addiction.” If he weren’t addicted, he would unquestionably agree with state control. Thus he is a totally passive recipient of “evil.” Such a brainless piece of meat needs protection. He may protest now, but he will love us later, when he has accepted Big Brother. The omniscient zealots are ordained (by themselves) to protect him and his children against himself (and the evil industry of the moment), whether he likes it or not.
Necessarily there is only one way to protect the victim from himself and the evil industries: forbid/control advertisement and knock out the fundamental right to information and choice. There are many efforts to control the Internet already [stored link], and many fights against that [stored link].
Tyranny rests on information control and the last venue of tyranny today is public health. Healthism has mounted an epic power grab. It must control the industries to control the people. This is nothing new. The control of private industry by the state through a “social pact” is at the very core of the Mussolinian Fascist economic doctrine.
To achieve a Fascist agenda, it is first of all necessary to redefine rights, and shift them to those of people like me, the teetotaller. That is done by using the nihilistic “right of not.” In the Italy of Mussolini, the “right of not” vastly prevailed over the “right to do,” since this convention allowed the state to interfere infinitely in the lives of its citizens, and thus control them, through “tough laws.”The passion for “tough laws” is quite visible today.
It is a terminology abundantly abused by governments and media. A “tough,” oppressive law was supposed to signal the political will of the Fascist oppressor to be “damn serious,” to “intervene,” with total disdain for citizens’ will and behaviour, and thorough contempt for all the precious values that the state disapproved of.
Today we see an abundance of “rights of not” – i.e., my “right” of NOT being exposed to the behaviour and smelly breath of the drunk, the “right” of NOT inhaling someone else’s smoke, the “right” of children of NOT having smoking or fat parents as role models, and so on.The oppressor feeds on hate and relies on a popular appetite for the same meal. He knows he must make this palatable for the masses. As even a tyrant needs to project a semblance of justification, a farcical performance of credibility is the inevitable side dish, offsetting the main course of vicious victimization.
Hence today’s mass-production of epidemiological junk studies lavishly paid with public funds to the complacent university near you, or "polls" paid by public health institutions that show "overwhelming" popular support for smoking bans. The obvious conflict of interest is to be totally overlooked in times of state propaganda.
Fools who have swallowed this will swallow anything, and the potential for violence of an incited mob, is limitless. Click here [stored link] and here [stored link] for just two examples.Continuous reference to authority and heavy paternalism is another essential element of Fascism. Does that sound familiar to my British friends? The “undisciplined” Italians have experienced that – and that ‘s why they have the reputation of being undisciplined in the first place, although the new generations are forgetful. Most nations never experienced Fascism directly and, for that reason, now tend to fall for the same cheap bedazzling lures: safety (playing on panic), health (an illusion of immortality), and protection (the disguise of subjection).
Now as before, liberty becomes a devalued commodity. Then as today, the trap was “liberty from” rather then “liberty to.”In combating the Fascist mentality, appeasement does not work, arguing is futile, logic does not apply. Civilized, tolerant behaviour is perceived by Fascists as a comical sign of weakness. The “antis” cannot be reasoned with or bargained with. When they concede something it is just to buy time to repress it better later.
Chamberlain did not understand that, but Churchill did, and said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last.” Sir Winston understood Fascism as well as he would understand the “antis” today.
Baby crocodiles may be cute and cuddly, and they may even be gentle and lovely. Kill them while you can, or you will become their next meal.Alcohol industry be warned. Defend yourself, or repeat the mistakes of the tobacco industry, and thereby meet your end.
Everyone who knows me also knows that I abhor alcohol. I never touched it in my life and probably never will – unless it’s to celebrate the defeat of the Therapeutic State.
The smell of alcohol turns my stomach (literally), and drunken people drive me nuts. Sometimes I even feel a surge of anger when I see a person’s speech and brain become progressively sluggish, embalmed in the stupor of self-induced idiocy.
Those are my emotions – but that is not a moral judgement, it is not a condemnation – and, especially, it is not a call for prohibition, control, regulation, and brainwashing of children and adults. That is because, fortunately, I have principles, thus I am not an “anti.” Indeed, I fight the “antis” with all I have.I submit here that society is getting progressively drunker on contemporary environmentalism and healthism.
The new fanaticism vomits panic, prohibition, regulation, control, surveillance, bureaucracy, state agencies, an idiotic perception of safety, and so on. It stinks with cheap moralism and arrogant contempt for dissent. Junk science and false information aimed at inducing “safe,” “healthy,” and “politically correct” behaviour belch at us noisomely.This drunken system sees dangers and risks everywhere. The real problem, the toxic system itself, cannot recognize the very real danger it represents, boggled as it is with multiplied visions of its paranoid fears. Stupefied bureaucracy and politics are so much under the influence of healthism that they can’t even count to ten, thus the only number they understand is zero. Zero risk. Zero tolerance. Zero smoking.
Zero emissions. Zero drinking. Zero accidents. Zero obesity.For that awful drunkenness I have infinite contempt. I call urgently for its suppression, and yes, that is a moral judgement. In this particular regard, surely and confidently, I advocate every strategy of war. Evil deserves to be strangled. It must be stopped. There is only one circumstance under which I am an anti, which is, when it comes to suppressing and annihilating the anti mentality. For it I have zero tolerance. Why? Because, for those intoxicated people, everything that makes life worthwhile can be happily sacrificed to suffocate and control their targets.
Liberty, economy, free markets, integrity, personal responsibility, politics, logic, truth, justice, employment and fairness are to them like the mindlessly motivated planetary gears in a differential: they have to change constantly to accommodate the drive. In other words, all those social conquests – some earned with blood – can all be redefined to accommodate the healthist crusades. The costs become irrelevant next to the projected and theoretical benefits of their ideology, implemented with “pretzel-logic” economics.Look at this website, for example [stored link]. It represents a gang of non-governmental organizations that are preparing for the suppression of alcohol through regulation.
Everyone reading here should be familiar with the pattern: it is that of the war against tobacco. The alcohol industry is depicted as the bad, sleazy guys eager to make money by killing people. The customers of the industry are its victims. The infectious agent sent out by the corrupting industry is advertisement. It follows that alcohol advertisement on the Internet (and everywhere else) must be suppressed – just as happened with tobacco.
The youth card is, of course, abundantly played. Please name a bigot (or a tyrant) who has not screamed “the children!” …Thank you, I knew you couldn’t think of one.
Finally, the junk science epidemiological stunner cannot be missing: did you know that drinking “causes” HIV?...Remarkably, the will of the “victim” is never, ever in the equation: the consumer has no resolve to refuse/ignore advertisement or to control his own behaviour. His judgement is impaired by his “addiction.” If he weren’t addicted, he would unquestionably agree with state control. Thus he is a totally passive recipient of “evil.” Such a brainless piece of meat needs protection. He may protest now, but he will love us later, when he has accepted Big Brother. The omniscient zealots are ordained (by themselves) to protect him and his children against himself (and the evil industry of the moment), whether he likes it or not.
Necessarily there is only one way to protect the victim from himself and the evil industries: forbid/control advertisement and knock out the fundamental right to information and choice. There are many efforts to control the Internet already [stored link], and many fights against that [stored link].
Tyranny rests on information control and the last venue of tyranny today is public health. Healthism has mounted an epic power grab. It must control the industries to control the people. This is nothing new. The control of private industry by the state through a “social pact” is at the very core of the Mussolinian Fascist economic doctrine.
To achieve a Fascist agenda, it is first of all necessary to redefine rights, and shift them to those of people like me, the teetotaller. That is done by using the nihilistic “right of not.” In the Italy of Mussolini, the “right of not” vastly prevailed over the “right to do,” since this convention allowed the state to interfere infinitely in the lives of its citizens, and thus control them, through “tough laws.”The passion for “tough laws” is quite visible today.
It is a terminology abundantly abused by governments and media. A “tough,” oppressive law was supposed to signal the political will of the Fascist oppressor to be “damn serious,” to “intervene,” with total disdain for citizens’ will and behaviour, and thorough contempt for all the precious values that the state disapproved of.
Today we see an abundance of “rights of not” – i.e., my “right” of NOT being exposed to the behaviour and smelly breath of the drunk, the “right” of NOT inhaling someone else’s smoke, the “right” of children of NOT having smoking or fat parents as role models, and so on.The oppressor feeds on hate and relies on a popular appetite for the same meal. He knows he must make this palatable for the masses. As even a tyrant needs to project a semblance of justification, a farcical performance of credibility is the inevitable side dish, offsetting the main course of vicious victimization.
Hence today’s mass-production of epidemiological junk studies lavishly paid with public funds to the complacent university near you, or "polls" paid by public health institutions that show "overwhelming" popular support for smoking bans. The obvious conflict of interest is to be totally overlooked in times of state propaganda.
Fools who have swallowed this will swallow anything, and the potential for violence of an incited mob, is limitless. Click here [stored link] and here [stored link] for just two examples.Continuous reference to authority and heavy paternalism is another essential element of Fascism. Does that sound familiar to my British friends? The “undisciplined” Italians have experienced that – and that ‘s why they have the reputation of being undisciplined in the first place, although the new generations are forgetful. Most nations never experienced Fascism directly and, for that reason, now tend to fall for the same cheap bedazzling lures: safety (playing on panic), health (an illusion of immortality), and protection (the disguise of subjection).
Now as before, liberty becomes a devalued commodity. Then as today, the trap was “liberty from” rather then “liberty to.”In combating the Fascist mentality, appeasement does not work, arguing is futile, logic does not apply. Civilized, tolerant behaviour is perceived by Fascists as a comical sign of weakness. The “antis” cannot be reasoned with or bargained with. When they concede something it is just to buy time to repress it better later.
Chamberlain did not understand that, but Churchill did, and said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile hoping it will eat him last.” Sir Winston understood Fascism as well as he would understand the “antis” today.
Baby crocodiles may be cute and cuddly, and they may even be gentle and lovely. Kill them while you can, or you will become their next meal.Alcohol industry be warned. Defend yourself, or repeat the mistakes of the tobacco industry, and thereby meet your end.
Friday, July 17, 2009
Quote of The Month
"If I knew for a certainty that a man was coming to my house with the conscious design of doing me good, I should run for my life."- Henry David Thoreau
Me too!!
Me too!!
Saturday, July 11, 2009
Are You Afraid Yet???
The food nazis are going to medicate your bread with folic acid. Good eh?? Well for me it is because I can now say I warned you years ago when I had my activist group Smokers of the world Unite and in a previous message .
Since the anti-smoking hysteria came in these nazis have insisted on additives in ciggies which can be a risk to the smokers health.
Folic acid in your bread and you cant say no, it may cause prostate cancer in men but never mind it may save 4 kids from spine abifita.
It is how the anti smoking stormtroops work but you dont listen, the majority must suffer for the safety of the few.
So what next you may ask...like I said there will be a knock on your door one day and an employee of nanny state will insist on checking your house for bacteria.
Well I would rather keep smoking with 2 rude fingers in the air than allow this nanny state to live my live, medicate my food and monitor my risk taking.
The majority of the world population get all they deserver because they allow this to happen.
Get off you arse and start screaming before your life is not your own.
Since the anti-smoking hysteria came in these nazis have insisted on additives in ciggies which can be a risk to the smokers health.
Folic acid in your bread and you cant say no, it may cause prostate cancer in men but never mind it may save 4 kids from spine abifita.
It is how the anti smoking stormtroops work but you dont listen, the majority must suffer for the safety of the few.
So what next you may ask...like I said there will be a knock on your door one day and an employee of nanny state will insist on checking your house for bacteria.
Well I would rather keep smoking with 2 rude fingers in the air than allow this nanny state to live my live, medicate my food and monitor my risk taking.
The majority of the world population get all they deserver because they allow this to happen.
Get off you arse and start screaming before your life is not your own.
Monday, July 6, 2009
The World Is Full Of Hypocrites!!!
There are 2 legal drugs in this world Alcohol and Tobacco. Both of these have health related risks. One also cause many car fatalities, broken marriages, child abuse both physical and mental. Both cause addiction. But one also cause violence in the community, can be the reason for rapes and murder.
One of these legal drugs would only cost $3.60 a pack but for the huge tax take which makes it approximately $13 a pack thats 75% geez and Aussie are saying they are going to put it up to $20 a pack.
Smokers you are not worth fighting for.
I have gotten my crystal ball out although this is already happening in a small way.
An American CARTON of cigs still only costs $12US. Work it out with a pencil folk, the criminal element will be applauding this and are already selling stolen or imported cigs from ships yachts etc and making a killing on them.
Buy a carton of cigs from overseas and sell them pack by pack for the price of the whole carton...WOOT!!
Alcohol, say a carton of beer you can by at a supermarket for $12 bucks it is not taxed at 75% like ciggies. and yet it causes more problems in our courts and families and communities than cigarettes.
There is something wrong here, but its all about money folk and power folk, these puritanical bastards could care less where I die of smoking. But smokers are now about 20% of the population, nearly 75% of the population imbibe a little or a lot of alcohol.
If the powers that be attack alcohol they would lose their power, smokers barhumbug , you have to have someone to hate, you cant hate jews, you cant hate gays, you cant be racist but you can bash a smoker over and over again you can eventaully turn them into a criminal because they have to go to the crims for their smokes, or push them into the closet, that other minorities have struggled out of and thats fine.
I am an old lady I have smoked since I was 9 I have become an agorophobic and a social phobic and am on an invalids benefit. A smoke is my only enjoyment in life. I am this way because I was raped by a drunken gang. I was beaten by a drunken husband, I was seperated from my father and 3 sibling, then abused by a boarder my mother had.
But I am a dirty filthy smoker and I deserve all I got and alcohol is not my prefered legal drug, being on a benefit I will soon have to go look for a crim who will sell me my legal drug cheaper than I can get from the legalized drug pushers.
It all really beats me. This page no longer is here to speak for other smoker it is here for me alone to scream into :-(
One of these legal drugs would only cost $3.60 a pack but for the huge tax take which makes it approximately $13 a pack thats 75% geez and Aussie are saying they are going to put it up to $20 a pack.
Smokers you are not worth fighting for.
I have gotten my crystal ball out although this is already happening in a small way.
An American CARTON of cigs still only costs $12US. Work it out with a pencil folk, the criminal element will be applauding this and are already selling stolen or imported cigs from ships yachts etc and making a killing on them.
Buy a carton of cigs from overseas and sell them pack by pack for the price of the whole carton...WOOT!!
Alcohol, say a carton of beer you can by at a supermarket for $12 bucks it is not taxed at 75% like ciggies. and yet it causes more problems in our courts and families and communities than cigarettes.
There is something wrong here, but its all about money folk and power folk, these puritanical bastards could care less where I die of smoking. But smokers are now about 20% of the population, nearly 75% of the population imbibe a little or a lot of alcohol.
If the powers that be attack alcohol they would lose their power, smokers barhumbug , you have to have someone to hate, you cant hate jews, you cant hate gays, you cant be racist but you can bash a smoker over and over again you can eventaully turn them into a criminal because they have to go to the crims for their smokes, or push them into the closet, that other minorities have struggled out of and thats fine.
I am an old lady I have smoked since I was 9 I have become an agorophobic and a social phobic and am on an invalids benefit. A smoke is my only enjoyment in life. I am this way because I was raped by a drunken gang. I was beaten by a drunken husband, I was seperated from my father and 3 sibling, then abused by a boarder my mother had.
But I am a dirty filthy smoker and I deserve all I got and alcohol is not my prefered legal drug, being on a benefit I will soon have to go look for a crim who will sell me my legal drug cheaper than I can get from the legalized drug pushers.
It all really beats me. This page no longer is here to speak for other smoker it is here for me alone to scream into :-(
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
